Can we assume, as
our conservative compatriots do, that “it’s all about jobs”? We cannot. Jobs are vitally important for individuals and for the common
good. But there’s more to life than work and more to the wellbeing of our
nation than jobs for those who can work.
Americans know
that. All Americans—those who have jobs and those who do not—want to breathe
clean air, drink clean water, eat safe food and take safe medicine. We value
good police and fire departments, expect well-regulated air traffic, and need
first-rate highways. We love our national, state and local parks. Given the
choice, Clevelanders would rather live next to a lake teaming with fish than
one blooming with algae. And we certainly depend upon our military and its
servicemen and women. Without governments funded by taxes, we’d have none of
those. Even if we all had jobs, life would be brutal and short.
Moreover, if the
measure of all things is whether they produce jobs, where does that leave those
who cannot work because of age (too young or too old), because of illness or
disability, or because of any condition beyond human control? Or those who have
made mistakes that leave them on the outside of job fairs looking in; will they
be given any chance to turn their lives around? If all government budgetary and
program efforts are narrowly focused on jobs alone, what of the large portions
of our population whose work is to get an education or who need programs that
can help them redirect their adult lives?
There’s more to
life than a job. There’s more to the power of our nation than its workforce
grinding out widgets. Even Americans sipping tea at their little party know
that. I long to hear a conservative commentator or politician support anything
for the common good other than cutting taxes.
Several months ago
someone took out an ad which listed most—maybe all—of the taxes Americans pay.
No reason was offered for publishing the list, but I can only assume its
intention was provoke an “ain’t it awful” reaction. But the ad never told what
those taxes pay for, what they buy for us who enjoy the highest standard of
living the world has even known and who, compared to much of the rest of the
world, bear a light tax burden. Do we want our fellow Americans who are poor to
live at level of abject poverty found in much of the world? How well we all
live together is a product of private enterprise and public policy, including
equitable and fair taxation.
We need jobs; good
paying jobs in good workplaces; jobs that produce useful products and offer
useful services. But we need more than jobs alone if we are to remain the
beacon nation celebrated by the Statue of Liberty. After all, the communist
Soviet Union boasted full employment…but who’d want to go there from here?
I agree with your position. I would like to make a complementary point. The rationale for a state includes economic prosperity, protection from external threats, maintenance of internal order and peace, liberty, justice, and enhancement of knowledge, technology, cultural creation and enjoyment. The view that economy, of unrestricted laissez faire form, is the sole independent variable that determines all others is naive. A balanced, holistic view of society, free of ideological bias, is sorely needed.
ReplyDelete