Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Spielberg’s Lincoln, and Me


1. On Sunday, November 18, I drafted the following, intending to post it today (November 20):
          “The current issue of The Sun has at least two pieces of wisdom for our nation:
          “Sparrow writes (p. 18): ‘In American politics we no longer use the term “extremist,” but I would like to bring it back because I am one. I believe in the extremes of human hope, generosity, and intuition. I believe our whole nation needs a massage: one of those deep-tissue massages that are excruciatingly painful but that “release blockages.”’
          “And Will Durant is quoted on page 45: “Continue to express your dissent and your needs, but remember to remain civilized, for you will sorely miss civilization if it is sacrificed in the turbulence of change.”
         “Wisdom for our nation, for our world, for our neighborhoods, and for ourselves.”
2. Last night I saw Abraham Lincoln inhabit Daniel Day-Lewis in Steven Spielberg’s film. Go see it.
3. This morning I am thinking the above two quotes reflect fairly naive understandings of political process. I am quite sure that, had Lincoln given and received massages, the Union in the form we know it would not have survived, and slavery might have persisted for decades.
4. But he did demonstrate “the extremes of human hope, generosity, and intuition,” and he remained remarkably civilized (if not entirely legal) in the midst of incivility and chaos. At great cost, he prevailed.
5. I have a lot to learn about politics.

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Who’ll Deliver the News Now?


I was not an outstanding paper boy.
Yes, I did the job faithfully. I rose early on all manner of 1950’s Iowa mornings, ventured forth on my balloon-tire bicycle to the corner of 8th and Main in Grundy Center, Iowa (pop. c. 2,500), and stuffed my allotted number of Des Moines Registers into the canvas bags fastened with bailing wire over the Schwinn’s back fender.

During the several the years I delivered the Register, mine was the shortest route in town. Despite our route boss’s best efforts - a man whose name (sounds like “Mr. Euwin”) I still remember because he told us “You ‘n’ me are friends,” which sounds pretty creepy 60 years later) - despite his attempts to bribe us with valuable prizes and an annual summer watermelon feed, I was never very enthusiastic about knocking on strangers’ doors to ask them if they wanted to subscribe to the big city daily, especially when their response was likely to be, “No, we get The Grundy Register every Thursday, and that’s all we read.”

Saturday morning collecting was also a chore I didn’t enjoy, but I did it and put a few dollars each week into my Farmer’s Saving’s Bank account. I kind of liked that, though even then amassing large sums of money was not a goal of my existence. Besides, I usually lost newer customers as soon as the “deal” they’d been offered to get them to sign up ran out. I resented trying to collect my 50 cents from such short-timers, knowing it would be my last.

But I loved delivering the paper itself because by the time I got home from my morning ride around the north side of town I had read the entire front page of the Register as well as the top halves of the first pages of all the other sections. (I learned that I could read much faster in the dead of winter than on a balmy spring morning.)

My route being short, I had little need to hurry through my deliveries, and as I slowly walked from my bike to each house to place the paper carefully inside the storm door or in the mail slot, I learned a whole lot about the world beyond Grundy Center, and Iowa even. I was first in my house to know that the governor of Iowa had been killed in a car crash and that Sputnik had flown off into space and all kinds of other momentous things. If knowledge is power, I possessed it, and anything that would hinder my acquisition of knowledge - such as a longer route - was not to be sought.

Of course, my dalliance at signing up new subscribers is one reason that the Cleveland Plain Dealer is rumored to be about to stop daily publishing and go to, say, three days a week. If only I’d found more new customers and built a bigger base!

Whether or not part of the fault is mine, I am devastated at the thought of Cleveland joining the growing ranks of cities that do not have daily newspapers. Yes, the world is changing. I check on-line news updates regularly through my day. My two adult children do not get the daily papers of their respective cities...and they don’t have land lines, either. They witness their parents slide deeper and deeper into cultural irrelevance.

But to be able to pick up, to touch, to linger over a daily newspaper! To wonder why a person who is willing to sign his or her real name would write such a stupid letter to the editor! To ponder the deep meaning of Doonesbury and predictable ordinariness of Marmaduke! To learn what the Indians/Browns/Cavs must do to win next season! To read dueling perspectives on a controversial issue right next to each other on one page and imagine what would happen if those two writers ever talked together! To be shocked by a scandal gradually unfolding headline by headline one day after another, or to be inspired by a columnist’s tale of unrehearsed kindness! To save “Kennedy Assassinated in Dallas” for your posterity and to stare at photographs whose stillness is destined to seal their moment in national consciousness forever! To know how to fold the paper so you can read it on the bus or subway! To see what’s at the movies and who’s preaching at First Pres and what charity benefit everyone who is anyone attended last weekend and who tried to shoplift what from Kohl’s the week before and who died ... the daily newspaper is a treasure trove of culture’s sublimity and silliness all in one fragile, but preservable, package. It will be missed, if not by my children, then by generations after them who will have to try to figure out how to “read” some antique flash-drive or floppy disk found in deceased parents’ attics.

Meanwhile, a new edition of The Grundy Register is printed and published each week as it has been since I can remember. It no doubt faces its own set of challenges, but perhaps it’s one of those icons always to remain beyond changing. All politics is local; and in the end, so is all news.

Friday, November 16, 2012

Tell all the Truth Slant


“...it’s been a gift that I was born baffled and have trusted my bafflement more than my certainties. I have my certainties, of course, but I don’t altogether trust them, because so many of them have been derailed over the years. I do, however, trust the kind of certainty you find in poetry. The poets have a way of nailing the truth without nailing it. It’s what Emily Dickinson was talking about when she said, ‘Tell all the Truth, but tell it slant.’ I love the notion that you can see more out of the corner of your eye that you can by looking straight ahead.”
- Parker J. Palmer, in the November 2012 Sun, p. 11

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Vote (Mostly) for Democrats


I thought I would do no more partisan political blogs, but Superstorm/Hurricane/Windstorm/Blizzard Sandy has pushed me over the top as if I were hit by a surge of water.
I doubt any climate scientist would say Sandy is “proof” of global climate change. But I am sure most would say that this ongoing tragedy is another sign of what most scientists have warned about: that the warming of the planet will result in more extremes of weather. Katrina...the continuing drought in our midwest...Sandy; they are all pieces of predicted patterns resulting from climate change.
People advise that we “not make politics from this disaster.” But why not? This is a political issue, for our political systems are the only power we-the-people have to stand up to short-term profit motives that compromise the long-term viability of our home planet. Healthy and responsive political power is the sole means by which we might assure our survival as a species, living at anything more than subsistence level.
The Republican Party is in the thrall of “know-nothing” self-anointed constitutional literalists. They only see things through ideologically-colored glasses, facts be damned. These are the very people who have brought us the idea of “legitimate rape,” of pregnancies that result from rape being “the will of God,” of childbirth never threatening the life of the mother. These are the people who call evolution, embryology and the Big Bang theory “lies from the pit of hell.” These are the people who believe Obama is waging a “War on Coal” (actually I think waging such a battle is a pretty good idea) and that “Obamacare” is a government "take-over" of the health-care non-system. These are people revising our economic history since Ronald Reagan to try to convince us that allowing the very rich to become very much richer somehow benefits the rest of us. (Check out “Why Obama Now” on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9G8XREyG0Q for a very partisan, but I believe much more accurate, telling of the story.)
And climate change? It’s as if they have never heard of it. I look forward to a video of Mitt Romney repeating to the people of coastal New Jersey what he said a few weeks ago: "I'm not in this race to slow the rise of the oceans or to heal the planet. I'm in this race to help the American people." Canned goods don’t cut it, Mr. Wanna-be President. We must lengthen our perspective on the challenges we face, and then face them. Doing that is the kind of “help” we need from our nation’s leaders, from our politics. Now. For our future.
Let me be honest: many Democrats are not a whole lot better. Too many of them/us wear blinders (not binders!) regarding our fiscal crisis. Too few of them/us make dealing with climate change a priority. If Obama is elected to a second term, he must pound the presidential bully pulpit and exercise strong political leadership regarding climate change. But if Romney is elected I am sure that won’t happen at all. Not a peep will come out of his mouth...well, unless he changes his views...again.
Not all Republicans are beholden to this historical aberration of cultivated ignorance, and a few Democrats are. And while a poll I saw today says more people believe Romney can “reach across the aisle” than can Obama, there’s little likelihood even Romney’s reach will extend as far as his party’s fundamentalist wing. Even John Boehner had trouble reaching that far, and he’s almost one of them. That’s why it is important to defeat as many far-right-wing Republicans as possible in congressional races, and to elect Barack Obama as President.
I have been tempted to vote for “Green Party” candidates to express my environmental concerns. But I cannot throw my vote away when the choice is so plain between electing leaders who despise science and other learning and those who pay at least some attention to facts and are thus more likely to make informed decisions for our nation’s present and future.
Given the choice between what the Republican Party offers and what the Democratic Party offers I urge you to vote (mostly) for Democrats...first for Barack Obama, and then, if you live in Ohio, for Sherrod Brown. They are by far the more informed choices.